NesvickCrops
I mentioned yesterday I thought that some might be looking at early assumptions on Prevent Plant area and scaling back on those figures a bit.  This seems reasonable considering the Northern Plains states typically lead the way in terms of PP area and those areas have seen relatively decent planting progress thus far and appear (for now) to have a benign forecast.  That being said, I did start looking at PP dates yesterday and I noticed that several southern states are approaching their “final” planting dates for corn and this might factor into planting decisions in the near future.  The amount of area under consideration here is not insignificant.  I’ve attached a breakdown of estimated corn acres unplanted based on Monday’s Crop Progress data.  We don’t have district-level planted area estimates yet, but I’m using historical norms vs. state-total figures for these estimates.

Estimated Corn Acres Unplanted

In particular I want to look at KS, CO, and MO for a moment.  “Final” planting dates for corn are fast approaching for a large majority of these states.  I’ll include the KS map below, but just keep in mind the date for most of eastern CO and western MO is May 25 as well.  Northeastern MO’s final planting date appears to be May 31.

Kansas 2017 Crop Year Final Planting Dates for Corn

So looking at the first map above, we have roughly 1.6 million acres of unplanted corn in KS, 400k in CO, and roughly 220k in MO where final planting dates are fast approaching.  How far past the final planting date will farmers be willing to go?  I don’t know the answer, and I’m hopeful for any feedback you’re willing to provide.  Certainly I’m not of the belief that we’re looking at 2 mil acres lost here, but I do believe it is reasonable to assume that not all of this area will be planted.  Certainly a favorable soil moisture profile in these areas might entice planting past the “final” date to take advantage of good conditions.  But basis in KS specifically remains depressed and farm-level prices appear to be below the cost of production.  If that is the case, why not take the PP?  Again, I’d appreciate any feedback.

Please note this is just a small sampling of commentary available to clients.  Please visit www.nesvick.com for more information.

DISCLAIMER:
The information contained herein has been taken from trade and statistical services and other sources we believe are reliable. Opinions expressed reflect judgments at this date and are subject to change without notice. These materials represent the opinions and viewpoints of the author  and do not necessarily reflect the opinions or trading strategies of Nesvick Trading Group LLC and its subsidiaries. Nesvick Trading Group, LLC does not guarantee that such information is accurate or complete and it should not be relied upon as such. Officers, employees, and affiliates of Nesvick Trading Group, LLC may or may not, from time to time, have long or short positions in, and buy or sell, the securities and derivatives (for their own account or others), if any, referred to in this commentary. There is risk of loss in trading futures and options and it is not suitable for all investors. PAST RESULTS ARE NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RETURNS. Nesvick Trading Group LLC is not responsible for any redistribution of this material by third parties or any trading decision taken by persons not intended to view this material.